AI needs a brand new law to effectively manage and fight crime, say UK experts

Recently, Jonathan Hall KC, the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, proposed that in order to crack down on radicalization that could lead to userAIchatbot, we need to make new laws. Hall's views stem from his understanding ofAI technologyAn in-depth look at the potential risks. He had attempted to communicate with a number of AI chatbots, one of which was described as a senior leader of the Islamic State organization, in an attempt to recruit him to join the terrorist group. This experience gave him insight into the regulatory gap that exists in the existing legal system for AI-generated content.

Hall argues that the new Online Safety Act passed last year does not apply to complex generativeartificial intelligence (AI)He emphasized that only human beings could commit terrorist crimes. He emphasized that only humans can commit terrorist crimes and that it is difficult to determine who can be legally responsible for chatbot-generated speech that encourages terrorism. This observation reveals an important point: in the context of the rapid development of AI technology, the existing legal system seems to struggle to cope with the security risks posed by AI-generated content.

In response to Hall's concerns, character.ai responded. They claimed that their terms of service prohibit hate speech and extremism, and emphasized that the company's products should never produce responses that encourage users to harm others. This response shows that the companies involved are aware of the possible security risks of their products and are working to regulate their content.

However, while companies have taken some measures, legislatures still need to focus on the challenges posed by the rapid development of AI technology. New laws should be able to clearly attribute responsibility, effectively combat the use of AI technology for terrorist activities, and provide adequate protection for users. With the widespread use of AI technology, it is necessary to revisit the existing legal system to ensure that it is able to address the security risks posed by AI-generated content. Only through the enactment of new laws and continued regulation can we ensure the healthy development of the technology while preventing its use for improper purposes.

This article comes from users or anonymous contributions, does not represent the position of Mass Intelligence; all content (including images, videos, etc.) in this article are copyrighted by the original author. Please refer to this site for the relevant issues involvedstatement denying or limiting responsibilityPlease contact the operator of this website for any infringement of rights (Contact Us) We will handle this as stated. Link to this article: https://dzzn.com/en/2024/2526.html

Like (0)
Previous January 3, 2024 at 2:23 pm
Next January 3, 2024 at 2:30 pm

Recommended

Leave a Reply

Please Login to Comment